Strauss Zelnick turned his running dispute with Elon Musk into a sharper public rebuke by joking that Musk is his top pick for someone living in a simulation.
Strauss Zelnick has spent the better part of 2026 swatting down Elon Musk's claims about AI making games. The Take-Two Interactive CEO has been patient, measured, and repeatedly correct, and in his latest interview, he delivered the most efficient takedown of the whole exchange with a single line.
If you had to choose someone who was a simulation, he would be my number one choice.
The comment was made in response to a question about Musk's ongoing fascination with the simulation hypothesis. Musk has publicly endorsed this idea for years, going so far as to say there is "a one in billions" chance that we are not in a simulation.
Zelnick's response flipped the question back on Musk himself. If anyone in this reality looks like an AI construct, it is the man who built his entire public persona on claims, products, and deadlines that consistently fail to materialize.
Just like that, Zelnick added more fodder to the ongoing public spat between two of the most well-known CEOs within their respective industries.
Get GTA BOOM in your feed.
Mark GTA BOOM as a "Preferred Source" on Google so our GTA 6 and GTA Online updates show up first.
Just for added context, it wasn't Zelnick who threw the first punch, or so to speak. In 2023, Musk announced that his AI company xAI was going to "make games great again." In 2025, he declared that xAI would "release a great AI-generated game before the end of 2026." In January 2026, he agreed with a viral post claiming AI could build a version of Grand Theft Auto 6 before Rockstar Games releases the real one in November.
Musk added that AI would soon be able to figure out what game you want to play without you even having to ask, which is also quite ironic coming from someone who doesn't like GTA at all. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney joined the conversation, saying "text-to-GTA" was the next logical step after text-to-image and text-to-video.
None of that has happened. xAI has not released a great AI-generated game. It has not released any game. The "text-to-GTA" future has produced nothing that resembles even the most primitive GTA clone, let alone a game capable of competing with a multi-billion-dollar title.
See a featured GTA BOOM Bookie market here.
This preview stays here while the full market card loads. If it does not appear, open The Bookie for the latest odds and active questions.
Open this market in The BookieZelnick, for his part, has said consistently that the idea of AI creating AAA games like Grand Theft Auto is "laughable" and that while AI tools "may help you create assets," they "won't help you create hits."
He has been right. Every single time.
Of course, Zelnick isn't calling Musk a fake. He is pointing out that Musk's claims about the future routinely fail to match the physical world's capacity to deliver on them. A person whose promises consistently fail to materialize looks, functionally, like an AI hallucination.
Mind you, Zelnick is not a person who traditionally engages in public sparring matches. He isn't as private as, let's say, Dan Houser or Sam Houser, but he doesn't say things unless he needs to do it. After all, he runs a public company, so when he pushes back on Musk, it is deliberate. He is protecting his company's interests against a narrative that could affect investor confidence.
Remember that Take-Two's stock price actually dropped when Google's Project Genie showed users generating crude GTA knockoffs using text prompts. Investors panicked. Zelnick's public statements about AI making games being "laughable" were as much for Wall Street as they were for Musk. He needed investors to understand that AI-generated asset creation is not the same thing as AI-generated AAA game development, and that nothing about the current state of AI threatens Rockstar's competitive position.
The ShinyHunters data leak proved him right. The leaked Grand Theft Auto Online revenue data, showing $500 million in annual revenue from a 13-year-old game, made it clear that Rockstar's live-service business is significantly stronger than public filings suggested. Take-Two's stock jumped over $1 billion after the leak. The company that Musk keeps insisting will lose to AI-generated titles is, in reality, an entertainment empire generating revenue numbers that no AI-generated product will match for the foreseeable future.
GTA 6 launches on November 19, 2026. xAIs "great AI-generated game" does not exist and shows no sign of ever existing. The Rockstar product that Musk insisted AI could replicate in minutes has taken over a decade to make and will generate more revenue in its first week than xAI has produced from gaming across its entire existence.
If one of these two men is operating outside the laws of observable reality, Zelnick is not wrong to suggest which one.
FAQ
Is this mainly a joke or a wider fight over AI and GTA?
It is both. Zelnick's simulation line was a joke aimed at Musk, but it also reinforces Take Two's position that current AI tools are nowhere near replacing AAA game development.
What concrete details back Zelnick's pushback on Musk's AI game claims?
Musk said xAI would release a great AI generated game before the end of 2026, but no xAI game is close to releasing. Meanwhile, GTA Online is bringing in $500 million annually, and Take Two's stock jumped after leaked data highlighted how strong Rockstar's business remains.
What is the main caveat in Zelnick's argument about AI?
He is not saying AI has no use in game development. His position is AI may help create assets, but it does not solve the creative and production work needed to make a hit like Grand Theft Auto.
